UX Professional Learning Hub

Relaunching the App for
a New Target Audience

Relaunching the App for a New Target Audience

COMPANY

Learners

My role

Lead UX Researcher
Team Facilitator

Time frame

10 weeks in 2024

Project Summary

Learners is a pioneering EdTech company that is transforming the UX industry through live-streamed events and curated conferences.

After experiencing a 95% churn rate on the landing page of its mobile app, the company decided to redesign the app to better serve a more focused target audience: students. My team was brought in to understand the needs of these students and recommend design solutions that would best address those needs.

My Team

  • Three UX Designers

  • Senior UX Researcher Mentor Ron Piell 

My Role

  • Lead UX Researcher

As the team's most experienced researcher, I took the lead in developing the research plan, conducting eight of the 11 interviews, designing survey questions, and creating user journey maps

Additionally, I collaborated with my teammates to recruit interviewees, analyze responses, synthesize research findings, create slideshows, and deliver the final presentation.

  • Team facilitator

I prepared meeting agendas, led weekly team meetings with Learners' CEO and the mentor, and took notes, which I organized and shared with the team.

Deliverables

The final presentation included:

  • Competitive Analysis

  • Survey Analysis

  • User Journey Maps

  • Application Preview

Impact

  1. My team and I defined the direction for redesigning the Learners mobile application to serve the new target audience.

  2. By challenging the company's assumptions, I identified a new group of customers with similar needs—bootcamp participants—and added them to the target audience.

My Approach

The Learners' CEO, Alec Levin, presented the following assumption to my team:

My team and I agreed with his assumption that a valuable resource is likely to spread quickly among students, as they often have peers with similar career interests.

However, I challenged his belief that students have the greatest need for an external resource, because they already have access to school-based resources like professors and alumni. I had an assumption that UX bootcamp participants—who are looking to transition into the UX industry but can't fully commit to formal education—might have an equally strong need for a resource like Learners.

While accepting the CEO's request to understand students' needs, I proposed testing my assumption for the following reasons:

  • Bootcamp participants represent a large group of potential users at similar career stages.

  • Bootcamp participants and alumni often have strong networks with shared interests in UX.

  • If their needs align with those of students, including them as a target audience could expand the user base with minimal additional effort.

The CEO and my team welcomed this suggestion, and we decided to include bootcamp participants in our study.

Research Questions

How might we effectively support students and bootcamp participants who aspire to work in the UX industry?

To answer the main question, we prioritized addressing the following sub-questions:

  • What are the learning needs and interests of students and bootcamp participants?

  • What features will motivate them to download the app?

  • How are they currently learning?  

Methods

Weekly CEO Interviews

I determined that understanding the company's priorities, previous research findings, and assumptions through direct communication with the co-founder and CEO was crucial, especially since this was our team's first project with Learners.

Competitive Analysis

My team focused on identifying Learners' strengths and weaknesses, compared to competitors that UX students use, and services that our target users desire but competitors don't offer.

11 Moderated User Interviews

We initially interviewed eight undergraduate and graduate students in Human-Computer Interaction and Human Centered Design and Engineering. I believed in-depth interviews would be an effective method to understand not only the students' needs but also the reasons behind them.

I attended UX networking events to better understand the needs of UX design bootcamp participants and recruited two of them for interviews.

We also interviewed a UX professional who provides portfolio reviews to students, validating our findings through a third party who frequently interacts with them.

Survey: 151 Entries

We received survey responses from students and bootcamp participants to quantify insights from the interviews and validate our findings.

Insights

[ Takeaways from Interviewing the CEO ]

  • The company’s primary focus is on providing free, scalable services to users.

  • User engagement—measured by frequency of use and time spent on the product—is a key performance indicator (KPI) for the company.

Based on these priorities, I worked with my team to develop recommendations that align with the company's goals.

[ Competitive Analysis Findings ]

Learners' Strengths:
The company has a strong network of UX professionals who deeply value the brand, as demonstrated by their involvement in conferences.

Learners' Weaknesses:

  1. The company lacks strong brand recognition among students.

  2. The features and content offered do not align with the needs or preferences of the student audience.

  3. High-quality content on the app and YouTube is not easily searchable or optimized for quick consumption on mobile devices.

Learners' 100+ videos were organized into just two playlists, with many videos over 30 minutes long. This made it difficult for users to find content by topic and watch on mobile.

Users can't search for specific questions and must scroll through the list to find what they're curious about.

I focused on strategies that build on the company's strengths while addressing its weaknesses.

[ Insights on Target Users and Key Recommendations ]

Challenge 1

Students hesitate to reach out to UX professionals

Why?

  1. They fear burdening strangers or being judged.

  2. They are unsure of what is appropriate to say.


Recommendations

  1. Display mentors' availability to signal that they are willing to help.

  2. Provide actionable networking tips within the app.

Why?

  1. They fear burdening strangers or being judged.

  2. They are unsure of what is appropriate to say.

Recommendations

  1. Display mentors' availability to signal that they are willing to help.

  2. Provide actionable networking tips within the app.

Challenge 2

UX professionals often do not respond to cold messages

Why?

1. Mentors receive an overwhelming number of similar questions.

2. There is little reward for answering questions.


Recommendations

  1. Make questions searchable by topic and career level to help students avoid asking repetitive questions.

  2. Recommend mentors with shared backgrounds and interests to provide more reasons to respond.

  3. Discover what motivates UX professionals to mentor beginners, in order to attract more engaged mentors to the app.

Why?

1. Mentors receive an overwhelming number of similar questions.

2. There is little reward for answering questions.

Recommendations

  1. Make questions searchable by topic and career level to help students avoid asking repetitive questions.

  2. Recommend mentors with shared backgrounds and interests to provide more reasons to respond.

  3. Discover what motivates UX professionals to mentor beginners, in order to attract more engaged mentors to the app.

  1. Many struggled with creating a UX portfolio.

Challenge 1

Users are unsure how to apply general tips to their case studies

Why?

  1. Portfolio resources typically offer tips for addressing common problems, rather than providing a full review on a specific case study.

  2. There are few one-on-one portfolio feedback opportunities with credible mentors who have relevant industry experience.


Recommendations

  1. Create a section where users can submit their portfolios for review by a mentor. Other users can also access these reviews to learn how to apply general tips to their own case studies.

  2. Expand the partnerships Learners has recently established. Invite industry professionals to conduct portfolio reviews on campus.

Why?

  1. Portfolio resources typically offer tips for addressing common problems, rather than providing a full review on a specific case study.

  2. There are few one-on-one portfolio feedback opportunities with credible mentors who have relevant industry experience.

Recommendations

  1. Create a section where users can submit their portfolios for review by a mentor. Other users can also access these reviews to learn how to apply general tips to their own case studies.

  2. Expand the partnerships Learners has recently established. Invite industry professionals to conduct portfolio reviews on campus.

Challenge 2

Users receive inconsistent feedback from different mentors

Why?

  1. Evaluating a UX portfolio is inherently subjective.

  2. Mentors in different career roles often have different criteria for evaluating portfolios, and students frequently receive feedback from mentors in positions that differ from their own career aspirations.


Recommendations

  1. Allow users to vote on helpful portfolio critiques, helping beginners understand what makes a strong portfolio through specific examples.

  2. Recommend mentors whose roles and fields align with the students' aspirations.

Why?

  1. Evaluating a UX portfolio is inherently subjective.

  2. Mentors in different career roles often have different criteria for evaluating portfolios, and students frequently receive feedback from mentors in positions that differ from their own career aspirations.

Recommendations

  1. Allow users to vote on helpful portfolio critiques, helping beginners understand what makes a strong portfolio through specific examples.

  2. Recommend mentors whose roles and fields align with the students' aspirations.

Impact

Impact

Impact

  • The insights have guided the direction for the mobile application redesign, highlighting specific features to prioritize in the coming years.

  • After the final presentation, the CEO mentioned that offering public portfolio reviews was a scalable feature his team hadn’t expected students to want, but they would like to prioritize it in the new app.

  • We identified a new group of users—bootcamp participants—with similar needs, enabling the company to expand its potential user base with minimal cost and effort.

What would I have done differently?

What would I have done differently?

What would I have done differently?

Plan ahead to prevent AI from manipulating survey results

As a result of offering a monetary incentive and distributing the survey publicly on LinkedIn, we received hundreds of responses generated by AI bots using fake accounts. To address this, I implemented reCAPTCHA, added validation questions, and randomized the question order. I also spent considerable time manually removing bot-generated responses. Next time, I will implement stricter screener and validation processes, and take proactive measures to prevent similar issues.

Become a domain expert to give recommendations that stakeholders in the industry find helpful

I focused on addressing the research questions using the methods outlined earlier, due to time constraints. I overlooked conducting secondary research to gain a broader understanding of the domain. In hindsight, I realized that a deeper understanding of both the UX and EdTech industries would have allowed us to develop more valuable insights and build stronger stakeholder trust. This was especially important since our stakeholder had extensive experience in the EdTech field, while my team was new to the project. Moving forward, in addition to primary research, I would prioritize secondary research to gain a deeper understanding of the domain, ensuring that our insights are grounded in a more comprehensive context.

Let's connect!

© 2024 – Yehyun Kim

Let's connect!

© 2024 – Yehyun Kim

Let's connect!

© 2024 – Yehyun Kim